Meeting:

Monthly Meeting  - Feb 2006

 

Held at:

The Brocklebank, Crewe

Date:

15th Feb 2006

 

 

Time:

17:00 – 18:00

Prepared by

Simon B

 

Chairperson:

K Pimm

 

Present:

Adrian T

 

 

Chris B

 

 

Dave G

 

 

Simon B

 

 

Richard W

 

 

 

 

 

Apologies:

Dave G Adrian T

 

 

Chairman’s Acceptance of Minutes

 


_____________________________________________


____ / _____ / ____

Signature

Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1        NEXT MEETING

To be proposed by email – Subject to Dave G’s availability

 

Suggested dates are 14th Mar or 16th Mar

2        Minutes of previous meeting

Accepted.

3         Actions from previous meeting

3.1             Actions Closed Since Last Meeting

Ref.

Description & Progress

Status

 

No actions closed since last month

 

3.2           Actions Carried forward to Next Meeting                     

See end of these minutes.

4          Treasurer’s Report

4.1            Monthly Report Summary

See separate report for detail. 

 

Highlights/Lowlights: 

 

A further new record profit of £22.6k.  Double digit %age contributions from CodaSciSys, Hunting, Raymarine and yet again Charter (4 in a row).

An additional £250 transferred to deposit account.

Still no response from HMRC

 

Matters Arising From Report

 

None

5             Portfolio Management

5.1           Monthly Money Management Checks

Fundamental portfolio is showing as “too low” with 17% held in this portfolio against strategic minimum of 25%.

We no longer have a Speculative holding but as the strategic range is  0%-25%, this is not actually “too low”.

Fundamental and Speculative proposals are very much encouraged.

5.2           Mechanical Portfolio

See Richard’s report

It was agreed that ISG should be bought (Value selection this month) as the mechanical portfolio should not be influenced by other holdings

5.3           Monthly Reports For Each Company in Fundamental Portfolio

CodaSciSys

HOLD – Not yet met sell criteria (see table in 5.6 below)

ISG

HOLD – Not yet met sell criteria (see table in 5.6 below)

Pace

HOLD – Not yet met sell criteria (see table in 5.6 below)

Raymarine

HOLD – Not yet met sell criteria (see table in 5.6 below)

UBC Media

HOLD – Not yet met sell criteria (see table in 5.6 below)

See separate monthly reports for more detail. 

 

5.4           Speculative Portfolio

No holdings in the speculative portfolio.

 

Proposals are encouraged.

 

An iShare may be worth considering; might not double in a year but we should remember that the Speculative portfolio was also to allow us to invest in products or markets that we are not familiar with.

 

Action 0215/01 CB to email the I share buy proposal, can everyone response with a Yes /No/ don’t know decision

5.5           Other Investments

 

 

A decision needs to be made at the March meeting if to move more cash into the investment trusts

 

Action 0215/02 CB To investigate a simpler way of transferring money between accounts

5.6           Stop Loss / Sell Criteria (as of date of treasurer’s report)

The following is the summary of sell criteria for each stock held within the Speculative or Fundamental portfolios The stop loss is invoked against the “end of day” price, but the sell decision may wait for the opening price to avoid rogue trades at the end of day.

Stock EPIC

Stock Name

Reportee

“High” Price

Stop Loss

Exit Criteria

UBC

UBC Media

Chris

25

20

25% trailing stop loss

Also review criteria on issue of any company announcement affecting prospects.

ISG

Interior Services Group

Dave

255

204

20% trailing stop

CSY

CodaSciSys

Richard

503

377.25

25% trailing stop loss

RAY

Raymarine

Simon

308

246.4

20% trailing stop loss.
Also review criteria on issue of any company announcement affecting prospects

PIC

Pace Micro

Simon

75.5

37.75

50% trailing stop loss.
Review when above £1.00

 

5.7           New Buy Proposals

 

Chris to email out the I share proposal

None.

6        Lucky Llama competition

From Richard’s mail….

 

The only major moves this month were in the wrong direction - Simon seeing Virotec nearly halve and Richard having CRC Group down by about a third. Not surprisingly they weren't in the running!

 

Dave just made it into positive territory but it was left to Chris to take the

honours with modest rises from Bizspace and Intermediate Capital Group.

Congrats Chris!

 

With just one month to go in this competition, Chris has also leapfrogged

Richard into the overall lead - but no one is out of the running at this stage

and a close finish is on the cards...

 

February results:

Chris    1.6%

Dave     0.2%

Adrian   0.0%

Kit      0.0%

Richard -7.5%

Simon   -8.1%

 

Overall standings:

Chris    £109,357.47

Richard  £106,800.29

Dave     £105,465.84

Simon    £101,187.58

Adrian   £100,000.00

Kit      £100,000.00

 

7        Competitions

Dave made the following entry to Proshare

 

======================================================================

 

The Best Investment Club Website
This award is open to: Clubs.

Websites are a great way for club members to communicate with each other and with other investors, helping to grow the UK investment club movement. Please tell us, in no more than 300 words, how your website has contributed to the development of UK investment clubs.

 

What is the aim of a club website? We believe it should be to help provoke ideas across the investment club community  When someone browses the website of another club, what are they looking for?  Possibly it is:-
            1. What shares do they hold
            2. How has their club performed
            3. What is their approach
            4. Is there anything our club can learn from their club?
We created
www.rollingstocks.co.uk in 1999 as an inward-facing repository of our meeting minutes. The site still serves that purpose for our Club but its primary purpose is now to be a source of potential ideas for other clubs.
The Constitution, Rules, minutes, club profile, current holdings, performance graph, links to other clubs.....these are the "staple", possibly minimum expected, content for most club websites.  However, whilst these things can answer questions 1 and 2 above, they don't address 3 or 4.
Our club has performed well in terms of making profits.  We put this down to our detailed strategy and the discipline of adhering to it.  Our website opens up our strategy, provides access to our templates, makes our annual reviews available and explains our interesting mechanical sub-portfolio.  The 'graphs and stats' pages act as a metrics catalogue and explain the dangers of relying on unit value as a performance measure.  And with having member in our club who is registered blind, the website complies with high accessibility settings. 
Our club website has attracted comment from other clubs and we've met a with three other clubs as a result of contact made through the website. It has been worthwhile in helping us meet other clubs and, just as importantly, provoke ideas across the investment club community

 

Most Successful Club using Traditional Share Trading
This award is open to: Clubs

This award is for the club that has had the most success using traditional methods of share trading. Success will be measured in terms of % increase in the value of their portfolio over 2005.


Most Successful Active Trading Club
This award is open to: Clubs

This award is for the club that has had the most success using both traditional and alternative trading methods, such as spread betting, CFDs, warrants, derivatives and penny shares. Success will be measured in terms of % increase in the value of their portfolio over 2005.


Value of club's investments at 31/12/2004 * :

 

£ 

Cash in hand at 31/12/2004:

 

£ 

Value of club's investments at 31/12/2005 * :

 

£ 

Cash in hand at 31/12/2005:

 

£ 

Total subs paid by members for purchase of units (01/01/2005 - 31/12/2005):

 

£ 

Repayments made to members selling back units (01/01/2005 - 31/12/2005):

 

£ 

* Valuation of the club's investments should be based on official London Stock Exchange closing prices (mid prices) on 31 December 2004 and 31 December 2005. A schedule showing investments held by the club at both dates should be submitted with your entry.

 

8        Spending on “Fun” and “Learning”

Nothing to discuss.

 

9        AOB

None

 


Actions carried forward to next meeting

Ref.

Description & Progress

Target Date

 

 

 

DG/0620/04

(Reassigned from ALL)

Consider writing an article for a paper or magazine or a more in depth one for the financial press

0718: No progress.  All to consider possible ideas, possibly centred on our mechanical portfolio

0810: No progress

0921: No progress

1017: No progress

1128: DG to create a “straw man” on the Mechanical portfolio

1219: No progress

0117: Terry Bond’s article in January’s Bloomberg Money indicates that he will look into our mechanical strategy and ‘report back next month’.  Wait to see whether anything appears in the Feb issue.

0215: Bought Bloomberg Money Feb edition and it had no mention of us so looks like we need to write something and tout it round.  I'll see if I can find time to draft a straw man article on the mech portfolio as suggested in the action.

Mar 06

AT/0718/01

Issue Chairman’s annual statement for 2005 via email

0810: No progress

0921: No progress

1017: No progress

1128: No progress

1219: No progress

0117: No progress

0215: No progress

Mar 06

DG&SB/0718/14

Propose a possible reworked top page for our website so that navigation can be made more like a portal

0810: No progress

0921: No progress

1017: No progress

1128: No progress – but still worth thinking about

1219: No progress

0117: No progress

0215: No progress

Mar 06

DG/0117/01

Update the Strategy with the process to select the highest ranked Growth stock using the Value weightings if there is more than one vacancy in the Value portfolio (and the equivalent process for the Growth side should there be two vacant slots there too).

0215: I sent out the proposed new strategy doc last week.  No comments back yet.  Maybe you could aim to approve at the meeting, or let me know what needs to change.

 

Meeting update

The basic principle should be that mechanical purchase should only consider the mech portfolio and buy shares accordingly – subject to normal money management checks

Mar 06

CB/1128/01

CB to produce audit pack

1219: No progress

0117: No progress

0215: No Progress

Mar 06


 
 
Proposed agenda for NEXT meeting.